论文标题
基于研究的评估在线管理
Online Administration of Research-Based Assessments
论文作者
论文摘要
在过去的几十年中，基于研究的评估的数量和使用已显着增长。可以将来自RBA的数据与国家数据集进行比较，以向讲师提供有关其教学实践功效的经验证据。但是，许多物理讲师选择不使用RBA，因为诸如必须使用课堂时间管理它们的障碍。 In this article we examine how these barriers can be mitigated through online administrations of RBAs, particularly through the use of free online RBA platforms that automate administering, scoring, and analyzing RBAs (e.g., the Learning About STEM Student Outcomes [LASSO], Colorado Learning Attitudes About Science Survey for Experimental Physics [E-CLASS], Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking [PLIC], and PhysPort DataExplorer平台）。我们还探讨了在线管理RBA的常见问题的研究，并以实用的指导指南结束。
The number and use of research-based assessments (RBAs) has grown significantly over the last several decades. Data from RBAs can be compared against national datasets to provide instructors with empirical evidence on the efficacy of their teaching practices. Many physics instructors, however, opt not to use RBAs due to barriers such as having to use class time to administer them. In this article we examine how these barriers can be mitigated through online administrations of RBAs, particularly through the use of free online RBA platforms that automate administering, scoring, and analyzing RBAs (e.g., the Learning About STEM Student Outcomes [LASSO], Colorado Learning Attitudes About Science Survey for Experimental Physics [E-CLASS], Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking [PLIC], and PhysPort DataExplorer platforms). We also explore the research into common concerns of administering RBAs online and conclude with a practical how-to guide for instructors.
