论文标题
共同-19限制对氮二氧化氮和臭氧大气浓度的全球影响
Global Impact of COVID-19 Restrictions on the Atmospheric Concentrations of Nitrogen Dioxide and Ozone
论文作者
论文摘要
与19009年大流行作斗争的社会势不可挡导致空气污染物排放的广泛减少。量化这些变化需要像往常一样的企业来解释空气污染物的概要变异性和季节性变异性。我们使用由NASA GEOS-CF模型的信息驱动的机器学习算法来评估二氧化氮的变化(no $ _ {2} $)和臭氧(O $ _ {3} $)在5,756个国家 /地区的观察地点为5,756个国家 /地区,从2020年1月至2020年6月。从严重影响的城市(例如武汉,米兰)的60%到几乎没有变化(例如,里约热内卢,台北)。从2020年2月开始,平均而言,没有$ _ {2} $浓度低18%。中国经历了最早,最急剧的下降,但是自四月以来的集中度大部分已经恢复,并且像往常一样在业务上保持在5%之内。没有$ _ {2} $减少在欧洲和美国的逐渐逐渐逐渐,从3月下旬开始停止恢复。我们估计,在2020年的前6个月中,全局no $ _ {x} $(no+no+no+no+no+no+no+no+no+no+no+no+no+no+no $ _ {2} $)的排放量为2.9 TGN,相当于年度人为总数的5.1%。非线性大气化学的竞争影响使表面o $ _ {3} $的响应变得复杂。虽然在某些地方表面o $ _ {3} $增加了50%,但我们发现在2020年2月至6月之间对每日平均o $ $ _ {3} $的总体净影响很小。但是,我们的分析表明,由于滴定减少和白天臭氧的减少,o $ _ {3} $昼夜循环的变平,夜间臭氧增加,这反映了光化学生产的减少。 o $ _ {3} $响应取决于季节,时间尺度和环境,如果没有$ _ {x} $降低缩减,则表面o $ $ _ {3} $预测。
Social-distancing to combat the COVID-19 pandemic has led to widespread reductions in air pollutant emissions. Quantifying these changes requires a business as usual counterfactual that accounts for the synoptic and seasonal variability of air pollutants. We use a machine learning algorithm driven by information from the NASA GEOS-CF model to assess changes in nitrogen dioxide (NO$_{2}$) and ozone (O$_{3}$) at 5,756 observation sites in 46 countries from January through June 2020. Reductions in NO$_{2}$ correlate with timing and intensity of COVID-19 restrictions, ranging from 60% in severely affected cities (e.g., Wuhan, Milan) to little change (e.g., Rio de Janeiro, Taipei). On average, NO$_{2}$ concentrations were 18% lower than business as usual from February 2020 onward. China experienced the earliest and steepest decline, but concentrations since April have mostly recovered and remained within 5% to the business as usual estimate. NO$_{2}$ reductions in Europe and the US have been more gradual with a halting recovery starting in late March. We estimate that the global NO$_{x}$ (NO+NO$_{2}$) emission reduction during the first 6 months of 2020 amounted to 2.9 TgN, equivalent to 5.1% of the annual anthropogenic total. The response of surface O$_{3}$ is complicated by competing influences of non-linear atmospheric chemistry. While surface O$_{3}$ increased by up to 50% in some locations, we find the overall net impact on daily average O$_{3}$ between February - June 2020 to be small. However, our analysis indicates a flattening of the O$_{3}$ diurnal cycle with an increase in night time ozone due to reduced titration and a decrease in daytime ozone, reflecting a reduction in photochemical production. The O$_{3}$ response is dependent on season, time scale, and environment, with declines in surface O$_{3}$ forecasted if NO$_{x}$ emission reductions continue.