论文标题
来自Swift Bat 70个月目录的35个硬X射线源的光谱分类
Optical spectroscopic classification of 35 hard X-ray sources from the Swift-BAT 70-month catalogue
论文作者
论文摘要
由于缺乏确定的较长的波长对应物,因此未知的尼尔·盖尔斯·斯威夫特天文台(Neil Gehrels Swift天文台(Neil Gehrels Swift)在板上发现的硬X射线源(大约是五分之一)的性质(约一五分之一)。没有这样的随访,X射线目录的天体物理价值有限:因此,自2009年以来,我们开始了一个长期项目,以揭示Swift通过使用大型地面望远镜和仪器的光线识别来源的光学特性。在这项工作中,我们通过介绍旨在查明和分类从70个月的BAT CATALOG中获得的35个硬X射线源的光学配对的光谱运动的结果来继续我们对未识别或研究不佳的硬X射线来源表征的表征。 (...)使用在六个不同的望远镜上使用的光谱,我们能够确定观察到的物体的主要光谱特性(连续类型,红移和发射或吸收线),并确定其性质。我们识别并表征了41个光学候选对应物,对应于35个硬X射线源,因为由于位置不确定性,有时可以与较高的能量检测有关。我们根据我们的观察结果讨论哪些是实际的(或至少很可能)对应的。特别是,我们样本中的31个来源是活跃的银河核:16个被归类为1型(具有宽和窄的发射线),而13个分类为2型(仅具有窄发射线);另外两个是BL Lac-Type对象。我们还确定了一个衬里,一个星爆和3个椭圆星系。其余5个对象是银河系来源:我们将其中的4个识别为灾难变量,而一个是低质量X射线二进制的。
The nature of a substantial percentage (about one fifth) of hard X-ray sources discovered with the BAT instrument onboard the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory (hereafter Swift) is unknown because of the lack of an identified longer-wavelength counterpart. Without such follow-up, an X-ray catalogue is of limited astrophysical value: we therefore embarked, since 2009, on a long-term project to uncover the optical properties of sources identified by Swift by using a large suite of ground-based telescopes and instruments. In this work, we continue our programme of characterization of unidentified or poorly studied hard X-ray sources by presenting the results of an optical spectroscopic campaign aimed at pinpointing and classifying the optical counterparts of 35 hard X-ray sources taken from the 70-month BAT catalogue. (...) With the use of optical spectra taken at six different telescopes we were able to identify the main spectral characteristics (continuum type, redshift, and emission or absorption lines) of the observed objects, and determined their nature. We identify and characterize a total of 41 optical candidate counterparts corresponding to 35 hard X-ray sources given that, because of positional uncertainties, multiple lower energy counterparts can sometimes be associated with higher energy detections. We discuss which ones are the actual (or at least most likely) counterparts based on our observational results. In particular, 31 sources in our sample are active galactic nuclei: 16 are classified as Type 1 (with broad and narrow emission lines) and 13 are classified as Type 2 (with narrow emission lines only); two more are BL Lac-type objects. We also identify one LINER, one starburst, and 3 elliptical galaxies. The remaining 5 objects are galactic sources: we identify 4 of them as cataclysmic variables, whereas one is a low mass X-ray binary.