论文标题

在液压跳跃中对齐自由表面特性

Aligning free surface properties in time-varying hydraulic jumps

论文作者

Li, Rui, Splinter, Kristen D., Felder, Stefan

论文摘要

液压跳跃通常发生在从超临界到亚临界流的暴力过渡中的自然通道和液压结构的能量耗散系统中。它们的特征是流动充气,高湍流和自由表面和跳脚趾的强烈波动。对于自由表面测量,通常使用快速采样,固定点仪器,例如声学仪表(ADM)和电线仪表(WGS),而LIDAR技术是一种相对较新的方法,用于记录充气流动流的瞬时游离表面运动。尽管这些仪器中的每一种都已显示为基本和先进的自由表面特性提供了合理的结果,但仪器和实验之间的差异仍无法解释。为了系统地分析这些差异,进行了充气液压跳跃的同时实验室实验。获得了三种仪器之间的良好一致性,用于基本的自由表面特性,包括高程,波动,偏度,峰度和频率,以及高级自由表面特性,例如积分时间和长度尺度。这些新结果表明,这些仪器中的任何一个都可以用于记录自由表面特性,尽管必须考虑自由表面尺度的集成极限。这项研究的一个关键发现是,在使用视觉跳跃脚趾进行对齐时,重复实验与以前的研究之间的差异。但是,可以通过使用LiDAR记录的平均跳跃脚趾位置来解决这种偏差。因此,未来的研究应同时测量瞬时跳跃脚趾,以在整个研究中提供更一致的结果。

Hydraulic jumps occur commonly in natural channels and energy dissipation systems of hydraulic structures in the violent transition from supercritical to subcritical flows. They are characterised by large flow aeration, high turbulence and strong fluctuations of the free surface and the jump toe. For free surface measurements, fast-sampling, fixed-point instruments such as acoustic displacement meters (ADMs) and wire gauges (WGs) are commonly used, while LIDAR technology is a relatively new method for recording instantaneous free surface motions of aerated flows. While each of these instruments has been shown previously to provide reasonable results for basic and advanced free surface properties, differences between instruments and experiments remain unexplained. To systematically analyse these differences, simultaneous laboratory experiments of aerated hydraulic jumps were conducted. Good agreement between the three instruments was obtained for basic free surface properties including elevations, fluctuations, skewness, kurtosis, and frequencies, as well as advanced free surface properties such as integral time and length scales. These new results indicate that any of these instruments can be used for the recording of free surface properties albeit the integration limit for free surface scales must be considered. A key finding of this research was that differences between repeated experiments as well as previous studies were observed when using the visual jump toe for alignment. However, this bias could be resolved by using the mean jump toe location recorded with the LIDAR. Therefore, future studies should simultaneously measure the instantaneous jump toe to provide more consistent results across studies.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源