论文标题
人类 - 建筑物的传感器:密集的纵向室内舒适模型
Humans-as-a-sensor for buildings: Intensive longitudinal indoor comfort models
论文作者
论文摘要
由于影响居住者舒适性偏好的大量生理,心理和环境变量,评估和优化建筑环境中的人类舒适度是具有挑战性的。人类的看法可能有助于捕获这些不同的现象并解释其影响。面临的挑战是以可扩展的方式在空间和时间上收集各种主观反馈。本文提出了一种方法,可以使用智能手表平台上的微观生态瞬时评估来收集基于舒适的偏好的密集纵向主观反馈。在两周内对30名乘员进行的实验进行了4,378个基于现场的调查,以进行热,噪声和声学偏好。然后根据这些偏好趋势聚集了乘员和留下反馈的空间。这些组用于创建与环境和生理变量组合的不同特征集,用于多类分类任务。这些分类模型是根据时间序列属性,环境和近身传感器,心率以及分配的个人和舒适组的历史偏好开发的功能集培训的。最精确的模型的热,光和噪声偏好分别为64%,80%和86%的多级分类F1微评分。讨论概述了这些模型如何在补充已安装传感器的数据时如何增强舒适性偏好预测。该方法提出了对建筑物分析社区如何通过平衡变量的测量与战略性地要求以密集的纵向方式来评估变量的测量方法来评估,控制和设计室内环境的反思。
Evaluating and optimising human comfort within the built environment is challenging due to the large number of physiological, psychological and environmental variables that affect occupant comfort preference. Human perception could be helpful to capture these disparate phenomena and interpreting their impact; the challenge is collecting spatially and temporally diverse subjective feedback in a scalable way. This paper presents a methodology to collect intensive longitudinal subjective feedback of comfort-based preference using micro ecological momentary assessments on a smartwatch platform. An experiment with 30 occupants over two weeks produced 4,378 field-based surveys for thermal, noise, and acoustic preference. The occupants and the spaces in which they left feedback were then clustered according to these preference tendencies. These groups were used to create different feature sets with combinations of environmental and physiological variables, for use in a multi-class classification task. These classification models were trained on a feature set that was developed from time-series attributes, environmental and near-body sensors, heart rate, and the historical preferences of both the individual and the comfort group assigned. The most accurate model had multi-class classification F1 micro scores of 64%, 80% and 86% for thermal, light, and noise preference, respectively. The discussion outlines how these models can enhance comfort preference prediction when supplementing data from installed sensors. The approach presented prompts reflection on how the building analysis community evaluates, controls, and designs indoor environments through balancing the measurement of variables with strategically asking for occupant preferences in an intensive longitudinal way.