论文标题

蒙特利尔AI伦理研究所的回应对在线内容审核中透明和问责制的圣克拉拉原则

Response by the Montreal AI Ethics Institute to the Santa Clara Principles on Transparency and Accountability in Online Content Moderation

论文作者

Ganapini, Marianna Bergamaschi, Lanteigne, Camylle, Gupta, Abhishek

论文摘要

2020年4月,电子边界基金会(EFF)公开呼吁评论扩大和改善圣克拉拉透明度和问责制原则(SCP),于2018年5月出版。蒙特利尔AI Ethics Institute(MAIEI)(MAIEI)通过在在线群体中根据培训和分析的互动来对此进行了一系列建议,从而对此进行了回应。咨询讲习班。 Maiei在提交的内容中为SCP提供了12个总体建议,其中包括:1)确保内容审核过程中有更多的多样性; 2)提高平台如何指导内容级别的透明度; 3)披露有关平台内容主持人的培训和/或文化背景的匿名数据; 4)针对特定问题量身定制内容审核工具; 5)有关在内容审核中的数据保护方面的消息传递应用程序的特定指南草案; 6)考虑到与在线可接受的行为相关的文化差异; 7)确保平台在政治广告方面是透明的; 8)确保对通过平台部署的用户生成的标记/报告系统的更大透明度; 9)澄清是否通过自动系统标记或报告用户内容; 10)提供有关从平台中删除的内容类型的更多数据; 11)提供有关上诉程序的明确指南以及先前上诉的数据; 12)创建一个用于定期重新审视SCP的系统,以反映各种技术进步,法律和政策的修改以及改变内容审核的趋势或运动。

In April 2020, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) publicly called for comments on expanding and improving the Santa Clara Principles on Transparency and Accountability (SCP), originally published in May 2018. The Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) responded to this call by drafting a set of recommendations based on insights and analysis by the MAIEI staff and supplemented by workshop contributions from the AI Ethics community convened during two online public consultation workshops. In its submission, MAIEI provides 12 overarching recommendations for the SCP, these include: 1) ensure there is more diversity in the content moderation process; 2) increase transparency into how platforms guide content-ranking; 3) disclose anonymized data on the training and/or cultural background of the content moderators for a platform; 4) tailor content moderation tools for specific issues; 5) draft specific guidelines for messaging applications with regards to data protection in content moderation; 6) take into account cultural differences relevant to what constitutes acceptable behavior online; 7) ensure platforms are transparent in regards to political advertising; 8) ensure greater transparency into the user-generated flagging/reporting systems deployed by a platform; 9) clarify if user content is flagged or reported through an automated system; 10) provide more data on the types of content removed from platforms; 11) provide clear guidelines on the appeal process, as well as data on prior appeals; 12) create a system for periodically revisiting the SCP so it reflects various technological advancements, modifications in law and policy, as well as changing trends or movements in content moderation.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源