论文标题
在19日期大流行期间,美国空气质量和人类流动性的变化
Changes in air quality and human mobility in the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic
论文作者
论文摘要
这项研究的第一个目的是量化美国大流行期间美国空气质量变化的大小和空间变化。我们专注于两种联邦调节的污染物,二氧化氮(NO2)和细颗粒物(PM2.5)。在2020年4月至2015 - 2019年前五年之间,比较了所有可用地面监测地点的观察到的浓度(分别为NO2和PM2.5的240和480)。在监测地点的65%以上,发现NO2浓度的统计学意义显着降低,与前五年的平均值相比,平均下降2 ppb。 NASA OMI的卫星衍生的NO2列总数证实了相同的模式。但是,来自地面监测位点的PM2.5浓度更可能更高。这项研究的第二个目标是解释在19009年大流行期间两种污染物的不同反应。提出的假设是,现场措施最大程度地影响了人们的驾驶模式,因此乘用车NO2排放量减少。商用车辆和所有目的的电力需求保持相对不变,因此PM2.5浓度并未显着下降。为了在观察到的NO2变化与人们庇护所在的程度之间建立相关性,我们使用了流动性指数,该指数是由笛卡尔实验室(Descartes Labs)生产并公开的。该移动性索引在县一级汇总了手机的使用,以捕获人类运动的变化。我们发现观察到的NO2浓度下降与人类迁移率的降低之间存在很强的相关性。相比之下,在迁移率和PM2.5浓度变化之间未检测到可辨别的模式,这表明单独的个人车辆流量减少可能无法有效减少PM2.5污染。
The first goal of this study is to quantify the magnitude and spatial variability of air quality changes in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic. We focus on two federally regulated pollutants, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Observed concentrations at all available ground monitoring sites (240 and 480 for NO2 and PM2.5, respectively) were compared between April 2020 and April of the prior five years, 2015-2019, as the baseline. Large statistically significant decreases in NO2 concentrations were found at more than 65% of the monitoring sites, with an average drop of 2 ppb when compared to the mean of the previous five years. The same patterns are confirmed by satellite-derived NO2 column totals from NASA OMI. PM2.5 concentrations from the ground monitoring sites, however, were more likely to be higher. The second goal of this study is to explain the different responses of the two pollutants during the COVID-19 pandemic. The hypothesis put forward is that the shelter-in-place measures affected peoples' driving patterns most dramatically, thus passenger vehicle NO2 emissions were reduced. Commercial vehicles and electricity demand for all purposes remained relatively unchanged, thus PM2.5 concentrations did not drop significantly. To establish a correlation between the observed NO2 changes and the extent to which people were sheltering in place, we use a mobility index, which was produced and made public by Descartes Labs. This mobility index aggregates cell phone usage at the county level to capture changes in human movement over time. We found a strong correlation between the observed decreases in NO2 concentrations and decreases in human mobility. By contrast, no discernible pattern was detected between mobility and PM2.5 concentrations changes, suggesting that decreases in personal-vehicle traffic alone may not be effective at reducing PM2.5 pollution.