论文标题

青光眼诊断的神经纤维层反射率的局灶性损失分析

Focal Loss Analysis of Nerve Fiber Layer Reflectance for Glaucoma Diagnosis

论文作者

Tan, Ou, Liu, Liang, You, Qisheng, Wang, Jie, Chen, Aiyin, Ing, Eliesa, Morrison, John C., Jia, Yali, Huang, David

论文摘要

目的:评估神经纤维层(NFL)的反射率,以诊断青光眼诊断。方法:使用光谱域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)对参与者进行4.5x4.5毫米的体积盘扫描成像。通过方位角滤波器处理归一化的NFL反射率图,以减少由于光束入射角变化而导致的定向反射率偏置。地图的围层区域分为160个超像素。平均反射率是超像素反射率的平均值。低反射性超级像素被确定为低于5%规范性截止的NFL反射率的超数。局灶性反射率损失是通过将低反射超级像素丢失的总和来度量的。结果:招募了35个正常,30次前期和35名青光眼参与者。方位角滤波提高了通过合并的超级像素标准偏差(SD)衡量的归一化NFL反射率的可重复性,从0.73到0.73至0.57 dB(p <0.001,配对t检验),并将人口SD从2.14降低到1.78 db(p <0.001,t-t-test)。大多数青光眼反射图显示了连续楔或弥漫性缺陷的特征模式。与最佳NFL厚度参数(总体,下或局灶性损耗量)相比,局灶性NFL反射率丧失的诊断灵敏度明显更高:PPG眼中53%v。23%(P = 0.027),PG 80%v。80%(p = 0.023)(p = 0.023)(p = 0.023),其特异性为99%。结论:方位角滤波可降低NFL反射率测量的可变性。与标准NFL厚度参数相比,局灶性NFL反射率损失具有出色的青光眼诊断精度。反射图可能可用于定位NFL缺陷。

Purpose: To evaluate nerve fiber layer (NFL) reflectance for glaucoma diagnosis. Methods: Participants were imaged with 4.5X4.5-mm volumetric disc scans using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). The normalized NFL reflectance map was processed by an azimuthal filter to reduce directional reflectance bias due to variation of beam incidence angle. The peripapillary area of the map was divided into 160 superpixels. Average reflectance was the mean of superpixel reflectance. Low-reflectance superpixels were identified as those with NFL reflectance below the 5 percentile normative cutoff. Focal reflectance loss was measure by summing loss in low-reflectance superpixels. Results: Thirty-five normal, 30 pre-perimetric and 35 perimetric glaucoma participants were enrolled. Azimuthal filtering improved the repeatability of the normalized NFL reflectance, as measured by the pooled superpixel standard deviation (SD), from 0.73 to 0.57 dB (p<0.001, paired t-test) and reduced the population SD from 2.14 to 1.78 dB (p<0.001, t-test). Most glaucomatous reflectance maps showed characteristic patterns of contiguous wedge or diffuse defects. Focal NFL reflectance loss had significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity than the best NFL thickness parameter (overall, inferior, or focal loss volume): 53% v. 23% (p=0.027) in PPG eyes and 100% v. 80% (p=0.023) in PG eyes, with the specificity fixed at 99%. Conclusions: Azimuthal filtering reduces the variability of NFL reflectance measurements. Focal NFL reflectance loss has excellent glaucoma diagnostic accuracy compared to the standard NFL thickness parameters. The reflectance map may be useful for localizing NFL defects.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源