关于ARXIV的注释：2005.05301，“中微子-4实验在寻找无菌中微子和获得的测量结果”

论文标题

关于ARXIV的注释：2005.05301，“中微子-4实验在寻找无菌中微子和获得的测量结果”

Note on arXiv:2005.05301, 'Preparation of the Neutrino-4 experiment on search for sterile neutrino and the obtained results of measurements'

论文作者

Almazán, H., Andriamirado, M., Balantekin, A. B., Band, H. R., Bass, C. D., Bergeron, D. E., Berish, D., Bonhomme, A., Bowden, N. S., Brodsky, J. P., Bryan, C. D., Buck, C., Classen, T., Conant, A. J., Deichert, G., Sanchez, P. del Amo, Diwan, M. V., Dolinski, M. J., Atmani, I. El, Erickson, A., Foust, B. T., Gaison, J. K., Galindo-Uribarri, A., Gilbert, C. E., Hackett, B. T., Hans, S., Hansell, A. B., Heeger, K. M., Jaffe, D. E., Ji, X., Jones, D. C., Kyzylova, O., Labit, L., Lamblin, J., Lane, C. E., Langford, T. J., LaRosa, J., Letourneau, A., Lhuillier, D., Licciardi, M., Littlejohn, B. R., Lu, X., Maricic, J., Materna, T., Mendenhall, M. P., Meyer, A. M., Milincic, R., Mitchell, I., Mueller, P. E., Mumm, H. P., Napolitano, J., Nave, C., Neilson, R., Nikkel, J. A., Norcini, D., Nour, S., Palomino-Gallo, J. L., Pessard, H., Pushin, D. A., Qian, X., Réal, J. -S., Roca, C., Rogly, R., Romero-Romero, E., Rosero, R., Savu, V., Schoppmann, S., Soldner, T., Stutz, A., Surukuchi, P. T., Tyra, M. A., Varner, R. L., Venegas-Vargas, D., Vialat, M., Weatherly, P. B., White, C., Wilhelmi, J., Woolverton, A., Yeh, M., Zhang, A., Zhang, C., Zhang, X.

论文摘要

我们对中微子-4合作的无菌中微子振荡的主张的观察[Arxiv：Arxiv：2005.05301]发表评论。这样的主张要求存在新的基本粒子，要求与其影响相称的严格程度。负担在于中微子4的合作，以提供证明其主张对社区的有效性所必需的信息。在本说明中，我们描述了数据和分析方法的各个方面，这些方面可能导致零件实验引起的振荡签名，并描述中微子-4协作所需的其他信息，以支持振荡主张。此外，与中微子4合作的主张相反，我们还表明，使用$ l/e $参数的“相干求和”方法与潜在客户和立体协作使用的方法产生相似的结果。

We comment on the claimed observation [arXiv:arXiv:2005.05301] of sterile neutrino oscillations by the Neutrino-4 collaboration. Such a claim, which requires the existence of a new fundamental particle, demands a level of rigor commensurate with its impact. The burden lies with the Neutrino-4 collaboration to provide the information necessary to prove the validity of their claim to the community. In this note, we describe aspects of both the data and analysis method that might lead to an oscillation signature arising from a null experiment and describe additional information needed from the Neutrino-4 collaboration to support the oscillation claim. Additionally, as opposed to the assertion made by the Neutrino-4 collaboration, we also show that the method of 'coherent summation' using the $L/E$ parameter produces similar results to the methods used by the PROSPECT and the STEREO collaborations.

下载PDF全文

下载文献需遵守相关版权规定

论文标题