论文标题
“可逆”和“不可逆”熵建模的等效性
Equivalence of 'Reversible' and 'Irreversible' Entropy Modeling
论文作者
论文摘要
当前有两个主要的连续熵模型：“可逆”，Clausius熵模型和一个“不可逆”的Onsager-Prigogine熵模型。结果表明，“可逆”和“不可逆”熵模型的方程相对于熵累积等效，这需要相同的熵变化值，从而导致相同的熵值。等效性与“可逆”熵模型DS = DQ/T的“第二个基本方程式”相矛盾，仅对“可逆”现象保持真实。等效性符合熵历史的独立性，这需要方程ds = dq/t，也必须使得不“可逆”现象成立。几个例子，例如通过商业工程软件，表明方程式DS = DQ/T也适用于“可逆”现象。该分析的两个结果，即两个熵模型的等效性和“可逆性”的虚假性，将通过方程式ds = dq/t的证据伪造，因为不可以“可逆”现象并不保持真实。没有提供这样的证据。两个熵模型的等效性的主要结果是简化了熵建模上下文中使用的语言。
There are currently two main, continuum models of entropy: a 'reversible', Clausius entropy model and an 'irreversible', Onsager-Prigogine entropy model. It is shown that the equations of the 'reversible' and the 'irreversible' entropy models are equivalent with respect to entropy accumulation, which entails same values of entropy change and, thus, same values of entropy. The equivalence contradicts the 'second fundamental equation' of the 'reversible' entropy model, dS = dQ/T, holding true for 'reversible' phenomena, only. The equivalence conforms with entropy history independence, which entails that equation dS = dQ/T must hold true for not 'reversible' phenomena, also. Several examples, e.g. by commercial engineering software, show that equation dS = dQ/T holds true for not 'reversible' phenomena, also. The two results of this analysis, the equivalence of the two entropy models and the falsity of 'reversibility', would be falsified by evidence for equation dS = dQ/T not holding true for not 'reversible' phenomena. No such evidence has been presented. The main consequence of the equivalence of the two entropy models is a signification simplification of the language used in the context of entropy modeling.
