论文标题

NH $ _ {3} $(1,1)猎户座中的超精细强度异常是分子云

NH$_{3}$ (1,1) hyperfine intensity anomalies in the Orion A molecular cloud

论文作者

Zhou, Dong-dong, Wu, Gang, Esimbek, Jarken, Henkel, CHristian, Zhou, Jian-jun, Li, Da-lei, Ji, Wei-guang, Zheng, Xing-wu

论文摘要

在LTE中,NH $ _ {3} $(1,1)过渡的两个内部卫星线(ISL)和两个外部卫星线(OSLS)都具有相同的强度。然而,观察到超精细强度异常(HIA)在恒星形成区域中无处不在,但仍未完全了解。在解决这个问题时,我们发现,按峰强度比的计算方法可能具有缺陷,尤其是在用于处理低速分散体的光谱时。因此,我们通过将其红移与蓝光的集成强度的比例来定义ISLS(hia $ _ {\ rm is} $)和OSLS(hia $ _ {\ rm os} $)的集成HIA(hia $ _ {\ rm os} $)。基于此程序,我们对Orion A MC北部的综合HIA进行了系统研究。我们发现集成的hia $ _ {\ rm is} $,而hia $ _ {\ rm os} $通常存在于猎户座中的mc中,并且在MC的不同位置找不到明确的区别。集成的hia $ _ {\ rm is} $和hia $ _ {\ rm OS} $的中位数分别为0.921 $ \ pm $ 0.003和1.422 $ \ pm $ 0.009,这与HIA核心模型一致,并且与CE型号不一致。选择这170个位置,其中集成的HIA都与Unity相差3- $σ$,大多数(166)的特征是Hia $ _ {\ rm is} $ <1,而HIA $ _ {\ rm os} $> 1的特征表明,这表明HIA核心模型比CE模型更重要。其余四个位置与CE模型一致。我们将整合的hias与para-nh $ _ {3} $列密度($ n $(para-nh $ _ {3} $)),动力温度($ t _ {\ rm k} $),速度分散($ t _ {\ rm k} $)($σ__{\ rm v} $) NT} $),以及NH $ _ {3} $(1,1)行的总不透明度($τ_{0} $)。他们的相关性无法通过HIA核心和CE模型完全解释。

In LTE, the two inner satellite lines (ISLs) and the two outer satellite lines (OSLs) of the NH$_{3}$ (1,1) transition are each predicted to have equal intensities. However, hyperfine intensity anomalies (HIAs) are observed to be omnipresent in star formation regions, which is still not fully understood. In addressing this issue, we find that the computation method of the HIA by the ratio of the peak intensities may have defects, especially when being used to process the spectra with low velocity dispersions. Therefore we define the integrated HIAs of the ISLs (HIA$_{\rm IS}$) and OSLs (HIA$_{\rm OS}$) by the ratio of their redshifted to blueshifted integrated intensities and develop a procedure to calculate them. Based on this procedure, we present a systematic study of the integrated HIAs in the northern part of the Orion A MC. We find that integrated HIA$_{\rm IS}$ and HIA$_{\rm OS}$ are commonly present in the Orion A MC and no clear distinction is found at different locations of the MC. The medians of the integrated HIA$_{\rm IS}$ and HIA$_{\rm OS}$ are 0.921$\pm$0.003 and 1.422$\pm$0.009, respectively, which is consistent with the HIA core model and inconsistent with the CE model. Selecting those 170 positions where both integrated HIAs deviate by more than 3-$σ$ from unity, most (166) are characterized by HIA$_{\rm IS}$<1 and HIA$_{\rm OS}$>1, which suggests that the HIA core model plays a more significant role than the CE model. The remaining four positions are consistent with the CE model. We compare the integrated HIAs with the para-NH$_{3}$ column density ($N$(para-NH$_{3}$)), kinetic temperature ($T_{\rm K}$), total velocity dispersion ($σ_{\rm v}$), non-thermal velocity dispersion ($σ_{\rm NT}$), and the total opacity of the NH$_{3}$ (1,1) line ($τ_{0}$). Their correlations can not be fully explained by neither the HIA core nor the CE model.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源