论文标题

表征ALMA线性偏振镶嵌的准确性

Characterizing the accuracy of ALMA linear-polarization mosaics

论文作者

Hull, Charles L. H., Cortes, Paulo C., Gouellec, Valentin J. M. Le, Girart, Josep M., Nagai, Hiroshi, Nakanishi, Kouichiro, Kameno, Seiji, Fomalont, Edward B., Brogan, Crystal L., Moellenbrock, George A., Paladino, Rosita, Villard, Eric

论文摘要

我们表征了使用Atacama大毫米/亚毫米阵列(ALMA)制成的线性偏振镶嵌物的准确性。首先,我们在3、5、6和7(3 mm,1.6 mm,1.3 mm,1.3 mm和0.87 mm)时观察到了明亮的,高度线性极化的Blazar 3c 279。在每个乐队中,我们在11 $ \ times $ 11 $ 11的网格上测量了Blazar的两极分化,该网格的间距均匀偏置点,覆盖了主要光束的半Ximim(FWHM)区域的全宽度。 After applying calibration solutions derived from the on-axis pointing of 3C 279 to all of the on- and off-axis data, we find that the residual polarization errors across the primary beam are similar at all frequencies: the residual errors in linear polarization fraction $P_\textrm{frac}$ and polarization position angle $χ$ are $\lesssim$0.001 ($\lesssim$0.1% of Stokes $ i $)和$ \ Lessim $ 1 $^\ Circ $在主要光束的中心附近;错误增加到$ \ sim $ 0.003-0.005($ \ sim $ 0.3-0.5%的stokes $ i $)和$ \ sim $ 1-5 $^\ circ $在FWHM附近,这是由于(线性极化)$ q $和$ u $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ y $ y $ y $ y $ y $ y $ $ $ $。我们在圆形极化(Stokes $ v $)地图中看到了预期的双眼“束斜视”图案。其次,为了测试一个典型的ALMA项目的极化精度,我们使用3和6的带有几种马赛克模式对猎户座(Orion-kl)的连续性线性极化朝向kleinmann-low nebula进行了观察。我们表明,在摩西克(Mosaicking)的情况下,残留的非轴向错误降低了多个点的剩余非轴向错误。 Finally, we compare the ALMA mosaics with an archival 1.3 mm CARMA polarization mosaic of Orion-KL and find good consistency in the polarization patterns.

We characterize the accuracy of linear-polarization mosaics made using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA). First, we observed the bright, highly linearly polarized blazar 3C 279 at Bands 3, 5, 6, and 7 (3 mm, 1.6 mm, 1.3 mm, and 0.87 mm, respectively). At each band, we measured the blazar's polarization on an 11$\times$11 grid of evenly-spaced offset pointings covering the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) area of the primary beam. After applying calibration solutions derived from the on-axis pointing of 3C 279 to all of the on- and off-axis data, we find that the residual polarization errors across the primary beam are similar at all frequencies: the residual errors in linear polarization fraction $P_\textrm{frac}$ and polarization position angle $χ$ are $\lesssim$0.001 ($\lesssim$0.1% of Stokes $I$) and $\lesssim$1$^\circ$ near the center of the primary beam; the errors increase to $\sim$0.003-0.005 ($\sim$0.3-0.5% of Stokes $I$) and $\sim$1-5$^\circ$ near the FWHM as a result of the asymmetric beam patterns in the (linearly polarized) $Q$ and $U$ maps. We see the expected double-lobed "beam squint" pattern in the circular polarization (Stokes $V$) maps. Second, to test the polarization accuracy in a typical ALMA project, we performed observations of continuum linear polarization toward the Kleinmann-Low nebula in Orion (Orion-KL) using several mosaic patterns at Bands 3 and 6. We show that after mosaicking, the residual off-axis errors decrease as a result of overlapping multiple pointings. Finally, we compare the ALMA mosaics with an archival 1.3 mm CARMA polarization mosaic of Orion-KL and find good consistency in the polarization patterns.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源