论文标题
表征ALMA线性偏振镶嵌的准确性
Characterizing the accuracy of ALMA linear-polarization mosaics
论文作者
论文摘要
我们表征了使用Atacama大毫米/亚毫米阵列(ALMA)制成的线性偏振镶嵌物的准确性。首先,我们在3、5、6和7(3 mm,1.6 mm,1.3 mm,1.3 mm和0.87 mm)时观察到了明亮的,高度线性极化的Blazar 3c 279。在每个乐队中,我们在11 $ \ times $ 11 $ 11的网格上测量了Blazar的两极分化,该网格的间距均匀偏置点,覆盖了主要光束的半Ximim(FWHM)区域的全宽度。 After applying calibration solutions derived from the on-axis pointing of 3C 279 to all of the on- and off-axis data, we find that the residual polarization errors across the primary beam are similar at all frequencies: the residual errors in linear polarization fraction $P_\textrm{frac}$ and polarization position angle $χ$ are $\lesssim$0.001 ($\lesssim$0.1% of Stokes $ i $)和$ \ Lessim $ 1 $^\ Circ $在主要光束的中心附近;错误增加到$ \ sim $ 0.003-0.005($ \ sim $ 0.3-0.5%的stokes $ i $)和$ \ sim $ 1-5 $^\ circ $在FWHM附近,这是由于(线性极化)$ q $和$ u $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ y $ y $ y $ y $ y $ y $ $ $ $。我们在圆形极化(Stokes $ v $)地图中看到了预期的双眼“束斜视”图案。其次,为了测试一个典型的ALMA项目的极化精度,我们使用3和6的带有几种马赛克模式对猎户座(Orion-kl)的连续性线性极化朝向kleinmann-low nebula进行了观察。我们表明,在摩西克(Mosaicking)的情况下,残留的非轴向错误降低了多个点的剩余非轴向错误。 Finally, we compare the ALMA mosaics with an archival 1.3 mm CARMA polarization mosaic of Orion-KL and find good consistency in the polarization patterns.
We characterize the accuracy of linear-polarization mosaics made using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA). First, we observed the bright, highly linearly polarized blazar 3C 279 at Bands 3, 5, 6, and 7 (3 mm, 1.6 mm, 1.3 mm, and 0.87 mm, respectively). At each band, we measured the blazar's polarization on an 11$\times$11 grid of evenly-spaced offset pointings covering the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) area of the primary beam. After applying calibration solutions derived from the on-axis pointing of 3C 279 to all of the on- and off-axis data, we find that the residual polarization errors across the primary beam are similar at all frequencies: the residual errors in linear polarization fraction $P_\textrm{frac}$ and polarization position angle $χ$ are $\lesssim$0.001 ($\lesssim$0.1% of Stokes $I$) and $\lesssim$1$^\circ$ near the center of the primary beam; the errors increase to $\sim$0.003-0.005 ($\sim$0.3-0.5% of Stokes $I$) and $\sim$1-5$^\circ$ near the FWHM as a result of the asymmetric beam patterns in the (linearly polarized) $Q$ and $U$ maps. We see the expected double-lobed "beam squint" pattern in the circular polarization (Stokes $V$) maps. Second, to test the polarization accuracy in a typical ALMA project, we performed observations of continuum linear polarization toward the Kleinmann-Low nebula in Orion (Orion-KL) using several mosaic patterns at Bands 3 and 6. We show that after mosaicking, the residual off-axis errors decrease as a result of overlapping multiple pointings. Finally, we compare the ALMA mosaics with an archival 1.3 mm CARMA polarization mosaic of Orion-KL and find good consistency in the polarization patterns.