论文标题
对神经建筑搜索的全面调查:挑战和解决方案
A Comprehensive Survey of Neural Architecture Search: Challenges and Solutions
论文作者
论文摘要
由于其强大的自动表示功能,深度学习在许多领域都取得了突破和实质性。已经证明,神经体系结构设计对于数据的特征表示和最终性能至关重要。但是,神经建筑的设计在很大程度上依赖于研究人员的先验知识和经验。由于人类固有的知识的局限性,人们很难跳出原始思维范式并设计一个最佳模型。因此,一个直观的想法是尽可能减少人类干预措施,并让算法自动设计神经体系结构。神经建筑搜索(NAS)就是一种革命性的算法,相关的研究工作是复杂而丰富的。因此,对NAS进行全面的系统调查至关重要。以前相关的调查已开始基于NAS的关键组成部分(搜索空间,搜索策略和评估策略)对现有工作进行分类。尽管这种分类方法更直观,但读者很难掌握所涉及的挑战和地标工作。因此,在这项调查中,我们提供了一个新的视角:首先概述了最早的NAS算法的特征,总结了这些早期NAS算法中的问题,然后为后续相关研究工作提供解决方案。此外,我们对这些作品进行了详细而全面的分析,比较和摘要。最后,我们提供了一些可能的未来研究方向。
Deep learning has made breakthroughs and substantial in many fields due to its powerful automatic representation capabilities. It has been proven that neural architecture design is crucial to the feature representation of data and the final performance. However, the design of the neural architecture heavily relies on the researchers' prior knowledge and experience. And due to the limitations of human' inherent knowledge, it is difficult for people to jump out of their original thinking paradigm and design an optimal model. Therefore, an intuitive idea would be to reduce human intervention as much as possible and let the algorithm automatically design the neural architecture. Neural Architecture Search (NAS) is just such a revolutionary algorithm, and the related research work is complicated and rich. Therefore, a comprehensive and systematic survey on the NAS is essential. Previously related surveys have begun to classify existing work mainly based on the key components of NAS: search space, search strategy, and evaluation strategy. While this classification method is more intuitive, it is difficult for readers to grasp the challenges and the landmark work involved. Therefore, in this survey, we provide a new perspective: beginning with an overview of the characteristics of the earliest NAS algorithms, summarizing the problems in these early NAS algorithms, and then providing solutions for subsequent related research work. Besides, we conduct a detailed and comprehensive analysis, comparison, and summary of these works. Finally, we provide some possible future research directions.