论文标题
太阳能模型中截止频率的数值确定
Numerical determination of the cutoff frequency in solar models
论文作者
论文摘要
在分层的大气中,当声波的频率高于截止值时,声波才能传播。不同的理论提供不同的截止值。我们开发了一种替代方法,可以在几种标准的太阳能模型中得出截止频率,包括各种安静和蒙布拉尔大气。我们对太阳大气中的波传播进行了数值模拟。截止频率是根据在两个大气高度下速度信号之间计算出的相位差异光谱的检查确定的。该过程是通过在光球和色球层之间的所有层上选择一对高度来执行的,以得出太阳能模型中截止的垂直分层。理论计算预测的截止频率与我们的测量值显着不同。在安静的气氛中,截止物显示出对绝热波传播的磁场的强烈依赖。当考虑辐射损失时,截止频率大大降低,并且随着磁场强度的强度而变化的变化较低。为了了解最近的静静和黑子观测,辐射损失在截止中的影响是必要的。在存在倾斜磁场的情况下,我们的数值计算证实了由于波浪沿场线传播的波降低而导致的截止频率降低。由于沿场引导波的路径较低,温度梯度较低,在温度显着变化的区域也有额外的还原。我们的结果表明,理论估计值未正确捕获截止值。此外,大多数广泛使用的分析截止公式忽略了磁场和辐射损失的影响,磁场和辐射损耗的影响对于确定波浪的复发性或传播性质至关重要。
In stratified atmospheres, acoustic waves can only propagate if their frequency is above the cutoff value. Different theories provide different cutoff values. We developed an alternative method to derive the cutoff frequency in several standard solar models, including various quiet-Sun and umbral atmospheres. We performed numerical simulations of wave propagation in the solar atmosphere. The cutoff frequency is determined from the inspection of phase difference spectra computed between the velocity signal at two atmospheric heights. The process is performed by choosing pairs of heights across all the layers between the photosphere and the chromosphere, to derive the vertical stratification of the cutoff in the solar models. The cutoff frequency predicted by the theoretical calculations departs significantly from our measurements. In quiet-Sun atmospheres, the cutoff shows a strong dependence on the magnetic field for adiabatic wave propagation. When radiative losses are taken into account, the cutoff frequency is greatly reduced and the variation of the cutoff with the strength of the magnetic field is lower. The effect of the radiative losses in the cutoff is necessary to understand recent quiet-Sun and sunspot observations. In the presence of inclined magnetic fields, our numerical calculations confirm the reduction of the cutoff frequency due to the reduced gravity experienced by waves propagating along field lines. An additional reduction is also found in regions with significant changes in the temperature, due to the lower temperature gradient along the path of field-guided waves. Our results show that the cutoff values are not correctly captured by theoretical estimates. In addition, most of the widely-used analytical cutoff formulae neglect the impact of magnetic fields and radiative losses, whose role is critical to determine the evanescent or propagating nature of the waves.