论文标题
严格干预对冠状病毒大流行的影响
The Effects of Stringent Interventions for Coronavirus Pandemic
论文作者
论文摘要
Covid-19的大流行在世界范围内造成了严重的公共卫生后果。 Covid-19的许多干预已实施。评估干预措施在Covid-19的大流行中的影响非常重要,社会健康非常重要。在本文中,借助合成控制方法,回归不连续性以及在隔离隔离(SIHR)模型中孤立的侵略性感染和感染性的易感性和感染性,我们评估了在中国的代表性的案例中,在中国的代表性的案例中,其经常进行了良好的策略,其经过良好的措施是在其自身的经常策略中,因此在经常进行了良好的情况下,其水平和纵向的严格干预措施是在逐渐得到的。我们发现,这些严格的干预措施具有统计学上显着的治疗效果,从而减少了证实的Covid-19病例。这些减少效应会随着时间的推移而增加。同样,如果严格的干预措施延迟了2天或实施了轻度干预措施,则预期的累积确认病例数将接近实际数量的2次或5次。严格的干预措施的影响对于减轻19009的流行状况很重要。实施干预措施越慢,流行病就越严重,需要干预措施越强。
The pandemic of COVID-19 has caused severe public health consequences around the world. Many interventions of COVID-19 have been implemented. It is of great public health and societal importance to evaluate the effects of interventions in the pandemic of COVID-19. In this paper, with help of synthetic control method, regression discontinuity and a Susceptible-Infected and infectious without isolation-Hospitalized in isolation-Removed (SIHR) model, we evaluate the horizontal and longitudinal effects of stringent interventions implemented in Wenzhou, a representative urban city of China, where stringent interventions were enforced to curb its own epidemic situation with rapidly increasing newly confirmed cases. We found that there were statistically significant treatment effects of those stringent interventions which reduced the cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19. Those reduction effects would increase over time. Also, if the stringent interventions were delayed by 2 days or mild interventions were implemented instead, the expected number of cumulative confirmed cases would have been nearly 2 times or 5 times of the actual number. The effects of stringent interventions are significant in mitigating the epidemic situation of COVID-19. The slower the interventions were implemented, the more severe the epidemic would have been, and the stronger the interventions would have been required.