论文标题

H0张力还是T0张力?

H0 tension or T0 tension?

论文作者

Ivanov, Mikhail M., Ali-Haïmoud, Yacine, Lesgourgues, Julien

论文摘要

我们研究哈勃常数$ h_0 $的本地和宇宙学测量值之间的差异是否可以在宇宙微波背景(CMB)单极温度$ t_0 $中重新构成张力。后者通常固定在CMB数据分析中的FIRA最佳拟合值。尽管几个独立的实验证实了这一值,但有趣的是,看到多少参数约束取决于此之前。我们首先提供了$ T_0 $对宇宙学观察力的影响的详细教学描述。我们表明,只要它们用能量尺度而不是红移,并且在固定的暗物质和每个CMB光子的巴属密度下,就可以将重组历史和传递函数取决于$ t_0 $。因此,$ t_0 $只是观察者的属性,可以量化关键宇宙事件之间的扩展数量。结果,$ T_0 $对小规模主要CMB各向异性的唯一效果是通过角直径到最后一个散射时期的距离,导致$ T_0 $和$ H_0 $之间的近乎完美的退化。这种几何变性部分通过延迟综合Sachs-Wolfe效应和CMB镜头来部分提升。尽管如此,仅Planck数据与$ H_0-T_0 $平面中的一个广泛区域是一致的,这意味着在$ T_0 $上删除先验的firas可以使Planck和Sh0s降低不差异,而无需引入$λ$ CDM以上的新物理学。一个人可能会通过将普朗克与SH0E相结合,从而打破堕落,从而产生$ t_0 $的独立尺寸,恰好与Firas的$3σ$张力。因此,确实可以将哈勃张力重新涂在$ t_0 $张力中。将Planck与Baryon声学振荡数据而不是SH0E相结合时,与FIRA的一致性将恢复。因此,即使我们丢弃firas $ t_0 $,SH0ES和宇宙学测量之间的张力仍然存在。

We study if the discrepancy between the local and cosmological measurements of the Hubble constant $H_0$ can be reformulated as a tension in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) monopole temperature $T_0$. The latter is customarily fixed to the FIRAS best-fit value in CMB data analyses. Although this value was confirmed by several independent experiments, it is interesting to see how much parameter constraints depend on this prior. We first provide a detailed pedagogical description of the $T_0$ effects on cosmological observables. We show that the recombination history and transfer functions do not depend on $T_0$, provided they are parametrized by the energy scale rather than redshift, and at fixed dark matter and baryon densities per CMB photon. Thus, $T_0$ is only a property of the observer, quantifying the amount of expansion between key cosmological events and today. As a consequence, the sole effect of $T_0$ on small-scale primary CMB anisotropies is through the angular diameter distance to the epoch of last scattering, resulting in a near-perfect degeneracy between $T_0$ and $H_0$. This geometric degeneracy is partially lifted by the late-time integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect and CMB lensing. Still, Planck data alone is consistent with a broad region in the $H_0-T_0$ plane, implying that removing the FIRAS prior on $T_0$ can make Planck and SH0ES less discrepant, without introducing new physics beyond $Λ$CDM. One may break the degeneracy by combining Planck with SH0ES, yielding an independent measurement of $T_0$, which happens to be in $3σ$ tension with FIRAS. Therefore, the Hubble tension indeed can be recast into the $T_0$ tension. The agreement with FIRAS is restored when combining Planck with the baryon acoustic oscillation data instead of SH0ES. Thus, the tension between SH0ES and cosmological measurements of $H_0$ persists even if we discard the FIRAS $T_0$ prior.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源