论文标题
橡胶弹性限制模型的比较
A comparison of limited-stretch models of rubber elasticity
论文作者
论文摘要
在本文中,我们描述了非线性橡胶弹性的各种有限拉伸模型,每种模型仅取决于左Cauchy绿应变张量的第一个不变性,并且仅具有两个独立的材料常数。这些模型被描述为有限拉伸或受限的弹性,因为应变能和应力响应在第一个不变的有限值时变得无限。这些模型很好地描述了橡胶组成的聚合物链的有限拉伸。我们讨论了Gent的模型,该模型是最简单的有限拉伸模型,并且与实验非常吻合。然后描述各种统计模型:单链,三链,四链和Arruda-boyce八链模型,所有这些模型均涉及逆倾斜函数。提供了三链和八链模型之间的数值比较。接下来,我们将涉及近似值的各种模型与八链模型的确切逆倾斜函数进行比较。提出了一个新的近似模型,它与科恩的原始模型一样简单,但更准确。我们表明,有效地,八链模型可以被视为新幽灵和绅士模型的线性组合。 Treloar的模型显示出我们新模型的百分比误差的一半,但要复杂得多。为了完整,引入了修改的Treloar模型,但这仅比Treloar的原始模型要准确。对于单轴张力,双轴张力,纯剪切和简单剪切的变形,我们将这些模型和Puso的精度与八链模型进行了比较,并通过图和表格进行比较。我们的近似值与文献中经常使用和描述的模型相比,在大多数参数范围内具有最小的平均百分比误差。
In this paper we describe various limited-stretch models of nonlinear rubber elasticity, each dependent on only the first invariant of the left Cauchy-Green strain tensor and having only two independent material constants. The models are described as limited-stretch, or restricted elastic, because the strain energy and stress response become infinite at a finite value of the first invariant. These models describe well the limited stretch of the polymer chains of which rubber is composed. We discuss Gent's model which is the simplest limited-stretch model and agrees well with experiment. Various statistical models are then described: the one-chain, three-chain, four-chain and Arruda-Boyce eight-chain models, all of which involve the inverse Langevin function. A numerical comparison between the three-chain and eight-chain models is provided. Next, we compare various models which involve approximations to the inverse Langevin function with the exact inverse Langevin function of the eight-chain model. A new approximate model is proposed that is as simple as Cohen's original model but significantly more accurate. We show that effectively the eight-chain model may be regarded as a linear combination of the neo-Hookean and Gent models. Treloar's model is shown to have about half the percentage error of our new model but it is much more complicated. For completeness a modified Treloar model is introduced but this is only slightly more accurate than Treloar's original model. For the deformations of uniaxial tension, biaxial tension, pure shear and simple shear we compare the accuracy of these models, and that of Puso, with the eight-chain model by means of graphs and a table. Our approximations compare extremely well with models frequently used and described in the literature, having the smallest mean percentage error over most of the range of the argument.