论文标题

3D增强了现实辅助CT引导的干预措施:使用HoloLens进行腹部幻影的系统设计和临床前试验2

3D Augmented Reality-Assisted CT-Guided Interventions: System Design and Preclinical Trial on an Abdominal Phantom using HoloLens 2

论文作者

Park, Brian J., Hunt, Stephen J., Nadolski, Gregory J., Gade, Terence P.

论文摘要

背景:平面外病变对CT引导的干预构成挑战。增强现实(AR)耳机设备已经发展,并且很容易地提供虚拟3D指导以改善CT引导的靶向。 目的:描述使用HoloLens 2的三维(3D)AR辅助导航系统的设计,并通过CT引导的模拟评估其性能。 材料和方法:进行了一项前瞻性试验,以评估有或没有AR引导的腹部幻影的CT引导针头靶向。总共招募了8位具有不同临床经验的操作员,总共进行了86个针球。在有或没有AR指导的情况下比较了程序效率,辐射剂量和并发症率。还进行了第一针通道的矢量分析。 结果:针线通过的平均总数从没有AR的7.4次通过到3.4通过的情况下降低到AR(降低54.2%,p = 0.011)。平均剂量长度(DLP)从没有AR的538 MGY-CM降低到AR的318 MGY-CM(降低41.0%,p = 0.009)。击中非靶向病变的并发症发生率从没有AR的11.9%(7/59针中)降低到AR(0/27针的通行证)的0%。第一针通道与理想目标轨迹与AR与没有AR的理想目标轨迹比对(分别为4.6°和8.0°偏移,p = 0.018)。医学生,居民和出席都在同一水平上在AR指导下进行。 结论:3D AR指南可以为靶向有挑战性的平面病变提供程序效率和辐射剂量节省的重大改善。不论先前的临床经验如何,AR指南都将所有操作员的性能提升到同一水平。

Background: Out-of-plane lesions pose challenges for CT-guided interventions. Augmented reality (AR) headset devices have evolved and are readily capable to provide virtual 3D guidance to improve CT-guided targeting. Purpose: To describe the design of a three-dimensional (3D) AR-assisted navigation system using HoloLens 2 and evaluate its performance through CT-guided simulations. Materials and Methods: A prospective trial was performed assessing CT-guided needle targeting on an abdominal phantom with and without AR guidance. A total of 8 operators with varying clinical experience were enrolled and performed a total of 86 needle passes. Procedure efficiency, radiation dose, and complication rates were compared with and without AR guidance. Vector analysis of the first needle pass was also performed. Results: Average total number of needle passes to reach the target reduced from 7.4 passes without AR to 3.4 passes with AR (54.2% decrease, p=0.011). Average dose-length product (DLP) decreased from 538 mGy-cm without AR to 318 mGy-cm with AR (41.0% decrease, p=0.009). Complication rate of hitting a non-targeted lesion decreased from 11.9% without AR (7/59 needle passes) to 0% with AR (0/27 needle passes). First needle passes were more nearly aligned with the ideal target trajectory with AR versus without AR (4.6° vs 8.0° offset, respectively, p=0.018). Medical students, residents, and attendings all performed at the same level with AR guidance. Conclusions: 3D AR guidance can provide significant improvements in procedural efficiency and radiation dose savings for targeting challenging, out-of-plane lesions. AR guidance elevated the performance of all operators to the same level irrespective of prior clinical experience.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源