论文标题
开处方燃烧对萨凡纳生态系统中火灾传播速度和强度的影响最小
Minimal effect of prescribed burning on fire spread rate and intensity in savanna ecosystems
论文作者
论文摘要
千年来,大火一直是地球不可或缺的一部分。最近的一些野火表现出空前的空间和时间范围,其控制超出了国家消防能力。规定或受控的燃烧处理被辩论是改善野火传播和强度的潜在措施。使用随机森林进行的机器学习分析是在一个时空数据集中进行的,其中包括22年的大量稀树草原大火。结果表明,在其他八个预测变量中,火灾返回间隔不是火灾差率或火力强度的重要预测指标,其特征为3.5%。操纵燃烧季节性在火灾蔓延速度或火力强度方面的特征为6%或更少。尽管操纵的火回报间隔和季节性促进了火灾蔓延速度和强度,但与气象(水文和气候)变量相比,它们的总体影响很低。关于火灾差异最重要的变量导致燃油水分为21%,相对湿度为15%,风速占14%,去年降雨量为14%。在火力强度上具有最高特征的变量包括燃料负荷为21.5%,燃料水分为16.5%,相对湿度为12.5%,空气温度为12.5%,降雨量为12.5%。到目前为止,预测火灾差异和强度一直是一项贫困的努力,我们表明,已经监测的变量的更多数据不会导致更高的预测精度。
Fire has been an integral part of the Earth for millennia. Several recent wildfires have exhibited an unprecedented spatial and temporal extent and their control is beyond national firefighting capabilities. Prescribed or controlled burning treatments are debated as a potential measure for ameliorating the spread and intensity of wildfires. Machine learning analysis using random forests was performed in a spatio-temporal data set comprising a large number of savanna fires across 22 years. Results indicate that fire return interval was not an important predictor of fire spread rate or fire intensity, having a feature importance of 3.5%, among eight other predictor variables. Manipulating burn seasonality showed a feature importance of 6% or less regarding fire spread rate or fire intensity. While manipulated fire return interval and seasonality moderated both fire spread rate and intensity, their overall effects were low in comparison with meteorological (hydrological and climatic) variables. The variables with the highest feature importance regarding fire spread rate resulted in fuel moisture with 21%, relative humidity with 15%, wind speed with 14%, and last years rainfall with 14%. The variables with the highest feature importance regarding fire intensity included fuel load with 21.5%, fuel moisture with 16.5%, relative humidity with 12.5%, air temperature with 12.5%, and rainfall with 12.5%. Predicting fire spread rate and intensity has been a poor endeavour thus far and we show that more data of the variables already monitored would not result in higher predictive accuracy.