论文标题

并行处理器调度:使用基于感知推理的方法学作为多目标语言优化和解决方案

Parallel processor scheduling: formulation as multi-objective linguistic optimization and solution using Perceptual Reasoning based methodology

论文作者

Gupta, Prashant K, Muhuri, Pranab K.

论文摘要

在工业4.0时代,重点是最小化人类因素,并最大程度地提高几乎所有工业和制造业机构的自动化。这些机构包含许多处理系统,这些处理系统可以与人类数量最少同时执行许多任务。该任务的并行执行是根据调度策略完成的。但是,很难将人元素的最小化是困难的。实际上,一群人(称为专家)的专业知识和经验即将制定富有成果的日程安排政策。调度策略的目的是实现目标的最佳价值,例如生产时间,成本等。在现实生活中,在任何并行处理方案中,通常都有多个目标。此外,专家通常会提供有关语言术语或词语的各种计划标准(与计划政策有关的各种计划标准(与计划政策有关的)。最好使用模糊集(FSS)对单词语义进行建模。因此,所有这些因素都促使我们将并行处理方案建模为多目标语言优化问题(MOLOP),并使用基于知觉推理(PR)的新方法来解决它。我们还将基于PR的溶液方法的结果与从基于2元组的解决方案方法获得的结果进行了比较。基于PR的解决方案方法提供了三个主要优势,即它生成了独特的建议,这里的语言建议与代码书单词匹配,并且单词模型也出现在单词之前。基于2元组的解决方案方法无法给出所有这些优势。因此,我们认为我们的工作是新颖的,将为未来的研究提供指导。

In the era of Industry 4.0, the focus is on the minimization of human element and maximizing the automation in almost all the industrial and manufacturing establishments. These establishments contain numerous processing systems, which can execute a number of tasks, in parallel with minimum number of human beings. This parallel execution of tasks is done in accordance to a scheduling policy. However, the minimization of human element beyond a certain point is difficult. In fact, the expertise and experience of a group of humans, called the experts, becomes imminent to design a fruitful scheduling policy. The aim of the scheduling policy is to achieve the optimal value of an objective, like production time, cost, etc. In real-life situations, there are more often than not, multiple objectives in any parallel processing scenario. Furthermore, the experts generally provide their opinions, about various scheduling criteria (pertaining to the scheduling policies) in linguistic terms or words. Word semantics are best modeled using fuzzy sets (FSs). Thus, all these factors have motivated us to model the parallel processing scenario as a multi-objective linguistic optimization problem (MOLOP) and use the novel perceptual reasoning (PR) based methodology for solving it. We have also compared the results of the PR based solution methodology with those obtained from the 2-tuple based solution methodology. PR based solution methodology offers three main advantages viz., it generates unique recommendations, here the linguistic recommendations match a codebook word, and also the word model comes before the word. 2-tuple based solution methodology fails to give all these advantages. Thus, we feel that our work is novel and will provide directions for the future research.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源