论文标题
使用移动设备的行为互动来对读者的先前熟悉和目标条件进行分类
Using Behavioral Interactions from a Mobile Device to Classify the Reader's Prior Familiarity and Goal Conditions
论文作者
论文摘要
学生阅读一本教科书来学习新主题。律师通过熟悉的法律文件。每个读者的阅读目标可能都有不同的目标和先验知识。捕获交互行为的移动环境可以提供有关这些阅读条件的见解。在本文中,我们专注于了解移动读者的不同阅读条件,因为这种理解可以促进设计有效的个性化功能以支持移动阅读。考虑到这一动机,我们分析了285名机械土耳其人参与者的阅读行为,他们阅读具有不同熟悉和阅读目标条件的移动设备上的文章。数据是非侵入性收集的,仅包括在非实验室环境中从移动电话中记录的行为互动。我们的发现表明,基于触摸位置的功能可用于区分熟悉度条件,而基于卷轴的功能和阅读时间功能则可以用来区分阅读目标条件。使用收集的数据,我们构建了一个模型,该模型可以比基线模型更准确地预测阅读目标条件(67.5%)。我们的模型还比基线更准确地预测熟悉程度(56.2%)。这些发现可以为移动阅读应用程序开发基于证据的阅读支持功能设计。此外,我们的研究方法可以很容易地扩展到不同的现实世界阅读环境,为未来的研究留下了很多潜力。
A student reads a textbook to learn a new topic; an attorney leafs through familiar legal documents. Each reader may have a different goal for, and prior knowledge of, their reading. A mobile context, which captures interaction behavior, can provide insights about these reading conditions. In this paper, we focus on understanding the different reading conditions of mobile readers, as such an understanding can facilitate the design of effective personalized features for supporting mobile reading. With this motivation in mind, we analyzed the reading behaviors of 285 Mechanical Turk participants who read articles on mobile devices with different familiarity and reading goal conditions. The data was collected non-invasively, only including behavioral interactions recorded from a mobile phone in a non-laboratory setting. Our findings suggest that features based on touch locations can be used to distinguish among familiarity conditions, while scroll-based features and reading time features can be used to differentiate between reading goal conditions. Using the collected data, we built a model that can predict the reading goal condition (67.5%) significantly more accurately than a baseline model. Our model also predicted the familiarity level (56.2%) marginally more accurately than the baseline. These findings can contribute to developing an evidence-based design of reading support features for mobile reading applications. Furthermore, our study methodology can be easily expanded to different real-world reading environments, leaving much potential for future investigations.