论文标题

多极有效的一体波形用于进攻二进制黑洞:构造和验证

Multipolar Effective-One-Body Waveforms for Precessing Binary Black Holes: Construction and Validation

论文作者

Ossokine, Serguei, Buonanno, Alessandra, Marsat, Sylvain, Cotesta, Roberto, Babak, Stanislav, Dietrich, Tim, Haas, Roland, Hinder, Ian, Pfeiffer, Harald P., Pürrer, Michael, Woodford, Charles J., Boyle, Michael, Kidder, Lawrence E., Scheel, Mark A., Szilágyi, Béla

论文摘要

随着重力波检测器变得更加敏感,我们将访问紧凑型二元系统发出的更多信号,从而阐明其天体物理的起源和环境。可以区分地层场景的关键物理效应是旋转的旋转旋转未对准,导致旋转和二进制轨道平面导致旋转。为了准确地建模此类系统,至关重要的是在主要四极之外包括多物。在这里,我们在有效的一体(EOB)形式上开发了第一个多极进攻波形模型,用于二进制黑洞的灵感,合并和环(IMR):seobnrv4phm。在不必要的限制中,该模型将校准为数值 - 利用率(NR)模拟和扰动理论的波形减少到SeoBNRV4HM。我们通过将SEOBNRV4PHM与模拟极限(SXS)合作的1405个预击NR波形的公共目录进行比较来验证,并将其与新的118个预感NR波形进行了比较,该目录范围为1-4,最高为0.9。我们强调的是,SeoBNRV4PHM未经校准在进攻扇区中的NR模拟。我们计算对1523 SXS进攻NR波形的不忠实,并发现,对于$ 94 \%\%$($ 57 \%$)的情况,最大值,总质量范围为$ 20-200 m_ \ odot $,为$ 3 \%$($ 1 \%\%$)。当使用IMR,多极,现象学模型imrphenompv3hm时,这些数字成为$ 83 \%$($ 20 \%$)。我们通过两项参数估计研究对合成信号的这种不忠值的影响。我们还计算了这些波形模型之间的不忠,并确定参数空间的哪一部分最大不同。我们还针对多极的NR替代模型NRSUR7DQ4验证它们,并发现SeoBNRV4PHM模型的表现优于Imrphenompv3HM。

As gravitational-wave detectors become more sensitive, we will access a greater variety of signals emitted by compact binary systems, shedding light on their astrophysical origin and environment. A key physical effect that can distinguish among formation scenarios is the misalignment of the spins with the orbital angular momentum, causing the spins and the binary's orbital plane to precess. To accurately model such systems, it is crucial to include multipoles beyond the dominant quadrupole. Here, we develop the first multipolar precessing waveform model in the effective-one-body (EOB) formalism for the inspiral, merger and ringdown (IMR) of binary black holes: SEOBNRv4PHM. In the nonprecessing limit, the model reduces to SEOBNRv4HM, which was calibrated to numerical-relativity (NR) simulations, and waveforms from perturbation theory. We validate SEOBNRv4PHM by comparing it to the public catalog of 1405 precessing NR waveforms of the Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes (SXS) collaboration, and also to new 118 precessing NR waveforms, which span mass ratios 1-4 and spins up to 0.9. We stress that SEOBNRv4PHM is not calibrated to NR simulations in the precessing sector. We compute the unfaithfulness against the 1523 SXS precessing NR waveforms, and find that, for $94\%$ ($57\%$) of the cases, the maximum value, in the total mass range $20-200 M_\odot$, is below $3\%$ ($1\%$). Those numbers become $83\%$ ($20\%$) when using the IMR, multipolar, precessing phenomenological model IMRPhenomPv3HM. We investigate the impact of such unfaithfulness values with two parameter-estimation studies on synthetic signals. We also compute the unfaithfulness between those waveform models and identify in which part of the parameter space they differ the most. We validate them also against the multipolar, precessing NR surrogate model NRSur7dq4, and find that the SEOBNRv4PHM model outperforms IMRPhenomPv3HM.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源