论文标题
使用非对比度计算机断层扫描和两阶段深度学习模型自动检测急性缺血性中风
Automatic detection of acute ischemic stroke using non-contrast computed tomography and two-stage deep learning model
论文作者
论文摘要
背景和目的:我们旨在开发和评估涉及两阶段深度学习模型的自动急性缺血性中风(AIS)检测系统。 方法:我们包括来自两个不同机构的238个案例。通过参考头部磁共振成像(MRI)图像,在238套头部CT图像中注释了与AIS相关的发现,在CT扫描后24小时内进行了MRI检查。这238例注释的病例被分为一个培训集,其中包括189例病例和测试集,其中包括49例病例。随后,仅使用V3模型和视觉几何组16分类模型来构建一个两阶段的深度学习检测模型。然后,两阶段模型在测试集中执行了AIS检测过程。为了评估检测模型的结果,经过董事会认证的放射科医生还在有助于检测模型的情况下评估了测试集CT图像。计算了AIS检测和假阳性数量的灵敏度,以评估测试集检测结果。使用MCNEMAR测试比较了有或没有软件检测结果的放射科医生的敏感性。 p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。 结果:对于没有软件结果的两阶段模型和放射科医生,灵敏度分别为37.3%,33.3%和41.3%,每种情况的假阳性数量分别为1.265、0.327和0.388。在使用两阶段检测模型的结果时,董事会认证的放射科医生的检测灵敏度显着提高(P值= 0.0313)。 结论:我们涉及两阶段深度学习模型的检测系统显着提高了放射科医生在AIS检测中的敏感性。
Background and Purpose: We aimed to develop and evaluate an automatic acute ischemic stroke-related (AIS) detection system involving a two-stage deep learning model. Methods: We included 238 cases from two different institutions. AIS-related findings were annotated on each of the 238 sets of head CT images by referring to head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images in which an MRI examination was performed within 24 h following the CT scan. These 238 annotated cases were divided into a training set including 189 cases and test set including 49 cases. Subsequently, a two-stage deep learning detection model was constructed from the training set using the You Only Look Once v3 model and Visual Geometry Group 16 classification model. Then, the two-stage model performed the AIS detection process in the test set. To assess the detection model's results, a board-certified radiologist also evaluated the test set head CT images with and without the aid of the detection model. The sensitivity of AIS detection and number of false positives were calculated for the evaluation of the test set detection results. The sensitivity of the radiologist with and without the software detection results was compared using the McNemar test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: For the two-stage model and radiologist without and with the use of the software results, the sensitivity was 37.3%, 33.3%, and 41.3%, respectively, and the number of false positives per one case was 1.265, 0.327, and 0.388, respectively. On using the two-stage detection model's results, the board-certified radiologist's detection sensitivity significantly improved (p-value = 0.0313). Conclusions: Our detection system involving the two-stage deep learning model significantly improved the radiologist's sensitivity in AIS detection.