论文标题

鹰模拟中的红外光度功能和灰尘质量功能

Infrared luminosity functions and dust mass functions in the EAGLE simulation

论文作者

Baes, Maarten, Trčka, Ana, Camps, Peter, Trayford, James, Katsianis, Antonios, Marchetti, Lucia, Theuns, Tom, Vaccari, Mattia, Vandenbroucke, Bert

论文摘要

我们基于与裙子辐射传递代码产生的合成多波长观测值,为Eagle宇宙模拟提供红外光度函数和尘埃质量函数。在本地宇宙中,我们很好地重现了观察到的红外光度和尘埃质量的功能。遇到了一些小差异,主要是在高光度制度中,那里的老鹰队的光度轻度起作用,但系统地低估了观察到的亮度。鹰队红外发光函数与观察到的一致性随着回避时间的增加而逐渐恶化。拟合修改后的Schechter函数与Eagle-Skirt的发光度和尘埃质量函数在不同的红移最高为$ z = 1 $处,我们发现该演化与纯亮度/质量演变兼容。进化相对温和:在此红移范围内,我们发现了$ l _ {\ star,250} \ propto(1+z)^{1.68} $,$ l _ {\ star,\ star,\ text {tir}} \ propto(1+z)^{2.51} $和$ m _ {\ star,\ text {dust}} \ propto(1+z)^{0.83} $用于特征光度/质量。对于亮度/质量密度,我们找到$ \ varepsilon_ {250} \ propto(1+z)^{1.62} $,$ \ varepsilon _ {\ text {tir}}} \ propto(1+z)^{2.35} $和$ρ_ {\ text {dust}} \ propto(1+z)^{0.80} $。尘埃质量密度的轻度演变与观察结果相对较好,但是红外发光度的缓慢演变低估了观察到的光度演变。我们认为,这些差异可以归因于由于分辨率越来越差而导致的辐射转移处理的局限性增加,并且与鹰模拟中SFR密度的演化相比,在我们的Eagle-Skirt后处理食谱中缺乏SFR密度的演变。

We present infrared luminosity functions and dust mass functions for the EAGLE cosmological simulation, based on synthetic multi-wavelength observations generated with the SKIRT radiative transfer code. In the local Universe, we reproduce the observed infrared luminosity and dust mass functions very well. Some minor discrepancies are encountered, mainly in the high luminosity regime, where the EAGLE-SKIRT luminosity functions mildly but systematically underestimate the observed ones. The agreement between the EAGLE-SKIRT infrared luminosity functions and the observed ones gradually worsens with increasing lookback time. Fitting modified Schechter functions to the EAGLE-SKIRT luminosity and dust mass functions at different redshifts up to $z=1$, we find that the evolution is compatible with pure luminosity/mass evolution. The evolution is relatively mild: within this redshift range, we find an evolution of $L_{\star,250}\propto(1+z)^{1.68}$, $L_{\star,\text{TIR}}\propto(1+z)^{2.51}$ and $M_{\star,\text{dust}}\propto(1+z)^{0.83}$ for the characteristic luminosity/mass. For the luminosity/mass density we find $\varepsilon_{250}\propto(1+z)^{1.62}$, $\varepsilon_{\text{TIR}}\propto(1+z)^{2.35}$ and $ρ_{\text{dust}}\propto(1+z)^{0.80}$, respectively. The mild evolution of the dust mass density is in relatively good agreement with observations, but the slow evolution of the infrared luminosity underestimates the observed luminosity evolution significantly. We argue that these differences can be attributed to increasing limitations in the radiative transfer treatment due to increasingly poorer resolution, combined with a slower than observed evolution of the SFR density in the EAGLE simulation and the lack of AGN emission in our EAGLE-SKIRT post-processing recipe.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源