论文标题
离散模型和连续模型之间的比较研究,用于在动态环境中竞争表型结构细胞群的演变
A comparative study between discrete and continuum models for the evolution of competing phenotype-structured cell populations in dynamical environments
论文作者
论文摘要
最近,已使用表型性状构成的人群的进化动力学来解决根据非本地部分差分方程式提出的确定性连续体模型,以解决有关适应无性物种定期波动环境条件的开放问题。这些确定性的连续模型通常是根据人口规模的现象学假设来定义的,无法捕获由单个个体的进化路径中随机变化驱动的适应性现象。在本文中,我们开发了一个基于随机的个体模型,用于在两个竞争表型结构的细胞种群之间进行的共进化,这些模型暴露于时变营养水平,并经历了具有不同概率的自发,可遗传的表型变化。每个单元的演变都由一组规则描述,这些规则会导致在表型状态的空间上进行离散的时间分支随机行走。我们正式表明,该模型的确定性连续体对应物包括一个针对细胞种群密度函数的非本地部分偏微分方程的系统,并与普通的微分方程相连,以供营养素浓度。我们比较了基于个体的模型及其连续类似物,重点是方案,在这种情况下,这两个模型的预测有所不同。我们的结果阐明了由于与人口较小相关的随机效应,两种模型之间存在显着差异的条件。这些差异是在表型变异概率低的情况下出现的,并且当两个种群的特征是拟合较小的初始平均表型和较小的表型异质性的初始水平时,变得更加明显。
Deterministic continuum models formulated in terms of non-local partial differential equations for the evolutionary dynamics of populations structured by phenotypic traits have been used recently to address open questions concerning the adaptation of asexual species to periodically fluctuating environmental conditions. These deterministic continuum models are usually defined on the basis of population-scale phenomenological assumptions and cannot capture adaptive phenomena that are driven by stochastic variability in the evolutionary paths of single individuals. In this paper, we develop a stochastic individual-based model for the coevolution between two competing phenotype-structured cell populations that are exposed to time-varying nutrient levels and undergo spontaneous, heritable phenotypic variations with different probabilities. The evolution of every cell is described by a set of rules that result in a discrete-time branching random walk on the space of phenotypic states. We formally show that the deterministic continuum counterpart of this model comprises a system of non-local partial differential equations for the cell population density functions coupled with an ordinary differential equation for the nutrient concentration. We compare the individual-based model and its continuum analogue, focussing on scenarios whereby the predictions of the two models differ. Our results clarify the conditions under which significant differences between the two models can emerge due to stochastic effects associated with small population levels. These differences arise in the presence of low probabilities of phenotypic variation, and become more apparent when the two populations are characterised by less fit initial mean phenotypes and smaller initial levels of phenotypic heterogeneity.