论文标题
碳排放和足迹与重新分配方案的全球不平等现象的历史演变
Historical Evolution of Global Inequality in Carbon Emissions and Footprints versus Redistributive Scenarios
论文作者
论文摘要
最近提出了雄心勃勃的碳排放再分配,以缓解气候变化,这与巴黎协议一致,并达到消除贫困的可持续发展目标。它们意味着到2030年,碳足迹不平等的大幅度降低了,这将Gini系数切成大约0.25。本文通过分析了二氧化碳排放中加权国际不平等的历史演变,从而归因于最终消费者的碳足迹,并归因于碳足迹的全球不平等,从而研究了这些情况的可行性。对于后者,构建了一个比现有数据集更全面的数据集。在这两种情况下,我们都发现全球不平等的趋势下降,部分归因于中国从分布的下部向中部移动,足迹比领土排放更不平等。这些结果表明,重新分配方案的实现将需要远低于历史水平的全球不平等现象。此外,近年来截至2017年的领土排放数据显示,GINI系数下降的饱和水平为0.5。该观察结果证实了基于最大熵推理的早期预测,即洛伦兹曲线会收敛到指数分布。这种饱和度进一步破坏了再分配情景的可行性,这也受到结构倾向的阻碍,这些趋势在全球资本主义下加强了碳足迹不平等。摆脱这个难题的一种方法是对全球能源供应的快速脱碳,以减少全球碳排放,而无需依赖碳不平等的降低。
Ambitious scenarios of carbon emission redistribution for mitigating climate change in line with the Paris Agreement and reaching the sustainable development goal of eradicating poverty have been proposed recently. They imply a strong reduction in carbon footprint inequality by 2030 that effectively halves the Gini coefficient to about 0.25. This paper examines feasibility of these scenarios by analyzing the historical evolution of both weighted international inequality in CO2 emissions attributed territorially and global inequality in carbon footprints attributed to end consumers. For the latter, a new dataset is constructed that is more comprehensive than existing ones. In both cases, we find a decreasing trend in global inequality, partially attributed to the move of China from the lower to the middle part of the distribution, with footprints more unequal than territorial emissions. These results show that realization of the redistributive scenarios would require an unprecedented reduction in global inequality far below historical levels. Moreover, the territorial emissions data, available for more recent years up to 2017, show a saturation of the decreasing Gini coefficient at a level of 0.5. This observation confirms an earlier prediction based on maximal entropy reasoning that the Lorenz curve converges to the exponential distribution. This saturation further undermines feasibility of the redistributive scenarios, which are also hindered by structural tendencies that reinforce carbon footprint inequality under global capitalism. One way out of this conundrum is a fast decarbonization of the global energy supply in order to decrease global carbon emissions without relying crucially on carbon inequality reduction.