论文标题

软件工程的快速评论

Rapid Reviews in Software Engineering

论文作者

Cartaxo, Bruno, Pinto, Gustavo, Soares, Sergio

论文摘要

将研究证据纳入实践是循证软件工程(EBSE)的主要目标之一。二级研究是主要的EBSE产品之一,旨在总结最佳的研究证据,并使从业者易于消耗它们。但是,最近的研究表明,一些二级研究缺乏与软件工程实践的联系。在本章中,我们介绍了快速评论的概念,这些概念是轻量级的二级研究,重点是及时向从业人员提供证据。快速审查在决策中支持从业人员,并应将其限制在实际问题上,并插入实际情况。因此,快速评论可以轻松地集成到知识/技术转移计划中。在描述了基本概念之后,我们介绍了进行两次快速评论的结果和经验。我们还提供指导方针,以帮助希望进行快速审查的研究人员和从业人员,我们终于讨论了我的研究社区有关快速评论作为基于证据的方法的可行性的主题。总之,我们认为快速评论可能会使研究人员和从业人员在软件工程研究与实践之间的交集中工作。

Integrating research evidence into practice is one of the main goals of Evidence-Based Software Engineering (EBSE). Secondary studies, one of the main EBSE products, are intended to summarize the best research evidence and make them easily consumable by practitioners. However, recent studies show that some secondary studies lack connections with software engineering practice. In this chapter, we present the concept of Rapid Reviews, which are lightweight secondary studies focused on delivering evidence to practitioners in a timely manner. Rapid reviews support practitioners in their decision-making, and should be conducted bounded to a practical problem, inserted into a practical context. Thus, Rapid Reviews can be easily integrated in a knowledge/technology transfer initiative. After describing the basic concepts, we present the results and experiences of conducting two Rapid Reviews. We also provide guidelines to help researchers and practitioners who want to conduct Rapid Reviews, and we finally discuss topics that my concern the research community about the feasibility of Rapid Reviews as an Evidence-Based method. In conclusion, we believe Rapid Reviews might interest researchers and practitioners working in the intersection between software engineering research and practice.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源