论文标题
一个框架来破译复杂疾病组合的遗传结构:心血管医学中的应用
A framework to decipher the genetic architecture of combinations of complex diseases: applications in cardiovascular medicine
论文作者
论文摘要
全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已被证明在揭示复杂疾病的遗传基础方面非常有用。目前,大多数GWA是针对对照组的特定单一疾病诊断的研究。但是,实际上,一个人通常会受到多种状况/混乱的影响。例如,冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者通常与糖尿病(DM)合并。沿着类似的线,研究一种疾病但没有合并症的患者通常具有临床意义。例如,肥胖的DM可能与非肥胖DM具有不同的病理生理学。 在这里,我们仅使用GWAS摘要统计数据开发了一个统计框架,以发现合并症(或无合并症的疾病)的易感性变异。从本质上讲,我们模仿了一个病例对照的GWA,其中病例受合并症或疾病影响而没有相关的合并症(无论哪种情况,我们都可以将这些病例视为受特定疾病亚型影响的病例,其特征是存在或不存在合并症的情况)。我们扩展了我们的方法论,以处理具有临床意义的类别(例如脂质)的连续特征。此外,我们说明了如何将分析框架扩展到两个以上的特征。我们通过将其应用于模拟场景和四个心脏代谢(CM)特征来验证我们方法的可行性和有效性。我们还分析了参与CM疾病亚型的基因,途径,细胞类型/组织。 LD评分回归分析表明,某些亚型确实在生物学上可能与遗传相关性低。 Mendelian随机分析进一步发现不同亚型对相关并发症的因果关系差异。我们认为这些发现既具有科学价值和临床价值,拟议的方法可能会为分析GWAS数据提供新的途径。
Genome-wide association studies(GWAS) have proven to be highly useful in revealing the genetic basis of complex diseases. At present, most GWAS are studies of a particular single disease diagnosis against controls. However, in practice, an individual is often affected by more than one condition/disorder. For example, patients with coronary artery disease(CAD) are often comorbid with diabetes mellitus(DM). Along a similar line, it is often clinically meaningful to study patients with one disease but without a comorbidity. For example, obese DM may have different pathophysiology from non-obese DM. Here we developed a statistical framework to uncover susceptibility variants for comorbid disorders (or a disorder without comorbidity), using GWAS summary statistics only. In essence, we mimicked a case-control GWAS in which the cases are affected with comorbidities or a disease without a relevant comorbid condition (in either case, we may consider the cases as those affected by a specific subtype of disease, as characterized by the presence or absence of comorbid conditions). We extended our methodology to deal with continuous traits with clinically meaningful categories (e.g. lipids). In addition, we illustrated how the analytic framework may be extended to more than two traits. We verified the feasibility and validity of our method by applying it to simulated scenarios and four cardiometabolic (CM) traits. We also analyzed the genes, pathways, cell-types/tissues involved in CM disease subtypes. LD-score regression analysis revealed some subtypes may indeed be biologically distinct with low genetic correlations. Further Mendelian randomization analysis found differential causal effects of different subtypes to relevant complications. We believe the findings are of both scientific and clinical value, and the proposed method may open a new avenue to analyzing GWAS data.