论文标题

对对流的处理对流的对对流的敏感性黑洞质量间隙的敏感性

Sensitivity of the lower-edge of the pair instability black hole mass gap to the treatment of time dependent convection

论文作者

Renzo, M., Farmer, R. J., Justham, S., de Mink, S. E., Götberg, Y., Marchant, P.

论文摘要

现在,重力波检测正在探测黑洞(BH)质量分布,包括预测的成对不稳定质量间隙。这些数据需要强大的定量预测,这些预测具有挑战性。最庞大的BH祖细胞在时间尺度上经历了比对流的转换时间尺度短的时期质量弹出。这使经典混合长度理论所依赖的稳态假设无效。我们比较了用两个不同版本的恒星进化代码\ texttt {mesa}计算的最终BH质量:(i)使用\ cite {paxton:18}的默认实现:18}和(ii)解决对流减速的时间表的附加方程。在第二个网格中,在脉冲和携带一部分能量的过程中会形成更强的对流,我们发现脉冲较弱。这会导致弹出质量的较低量,从而更高的最终BH质量为$ \ sim $ \,$ 5 \,m_ \ odot $。对于确定差距以下BHS最大质量的祖细胞的差异要小得多。至少在本研究的理想化环境中,该预测在$ m _ {\ rm bh,max} \ simeq 48 \,m_ \ odot $上是可靠的。这令人鼓舞地表明,当前模型足以与当今的重力波检测进行比较。但是,各个模型之间的巨大差异强调了改善恒星模型中对流处理的重要性,尤其是鉴于第三代重力波探测器所预期的数据。

Gravitational-wave detections are now probing the black hole (BH) mass distribution, including the predicted pair-instability mass gap. These data require robust quantitative predictions, which are challenging to obtain. The most massive BH progenitors experience episodic mass ejections on timescales shorter than the convective turn-over timescale. This invalidates the steady-state assumption on which the classic mixing-length theory relies. We compare the final BH masses computed with two different versions of the stellar evolutionary code \texttt{MESA}: (i) using the default implementation of \cite{paxton:18} and (ii) solving an additional equation accounting for the timescale for convective deceleration. In the second grid, where stronger convection develops during the pulses and carries part of the energy, we find weaker pulses. This leads to lower amounts of mass being ejected and thus higher final BH masses of up to $\sim$\,$5\,M_\odot$. The differences are much smaller for the progenitors which determine the maximum mass of BHs below the gap. This prediction is robust at $M_{\rm BH, max}\simeq 48\,M_\odot$, at least within the idealized context of this study. This is an encouraging indication that current models are robust enough for comparison with the present-day gravitational-wave detections. However, the large differences between individual models emphasize the importance of improving the treatment of convection in stellar models, especially in the light of the data anticipated from the third generation of gravitational wave detectors.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源